Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Fund Fees for Currency Hedging

The performance of currency-hedged funds vs their non-hedged counterparts are largely based on currency fluctuations. Take a look at the yearly performance of the hedged and non-hedged TD e-Series funds. Everyone has an opinion on whether hedging is a good idea, and it seems to me that much of it has to do with recency.

In any case, I thought it would be interesting to see how much fund companies are charging for the benefits (whatever the benefits may be) of currency hedging:


Index/SectorHedged FundMERDetailsHedging Fee
iShares
S&P 500XSP0.24%Holds IVV (0.09%)0.15%
Russel 2000XSU0.35%Holds IWM (0.20%)0.15%
EAFEXIN0.49%Holds EFA (0.34%)0.15%
Claymore
Core USCLU0.65%Non-hedged CLU.C charges 0.65%0.00%
Emerging MarketsCWO0.65%Holds VWO (0.27%). Since VWO is not a Claymore fund, the CWO MER is on top of what is charged by VWO.
0.65%
Global DividendCYH0.65%Holds 60/40 split of HGI (0.65%) and CVY (0.60%). Blended MER is 0.63%0.02%
TD e-Series
US Index
0.48%Non-hedged MER 0.33%0.15%
International Index (EAFE)

0.50%Non-hedged MER 0.48%0.02%


Those are the currency-hedged funds I was able to find from iShares, Claymore, and the TD e-Series funds. I also wanted to look at the BMO ETFs, but will wait until they are actually trading before running through this exercise with them.

I'll let you decide whether or not currency hedging is a good idea, but you can see that funds are charging quite a wide range of fees for the service. iShares seems to charge a "standard" 0.15% which in my opinion is a little high. Then there is Claymore, with a wide range of fees depending on the fund, from 0.65% to hedge world currencies (CWO), down to 0% for US Dollars (CLU vs CLU.C). One point to note is that if you are interested in a hedged version of the EAFE index, it may be more cost effective to use the TD e-Series fund at 0.5% MER versus XIN which charges 0.49% MER since the TD e-Series funds don't incur transaction fees.

No comments:

Post a Comment